Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Modern Blaxploitation


            In an attempt to appeal to African-American audiences in the 1970s, Hollywood began making films centered on urban African-American protagonists, and the blaxploitation film genre was born. In these films, the protagonist was typically “violent, flashy, and charismatic” (Benshoff and Griffin 88); a super-fly, sexualized black man, fighting the system and representing black power.
            The blaxploitation genre first became popular in the 1970s, with films like Shaft (1971) and Superfly (1972). Hollywood studios were satisfied by their appeal to both African-American and white audiences. But it wasn’t long before blaxploitation films began receiving criticism. Not only do these films extremely employ the use of negative stereotypes, they also often glorify illegal activity. As Benshoff and Griffin put it: “What kind of a role model for impressionable inner-city youth is a sexy, super-cool cocaine dealer?” (89). In response to this criticism, Hollywood held off from making more blaxploitation films, at least for a while.
I can hear the theme song now...

            The 1990s saw a resurgence of blaxploitation films. These “neo-blaxploitation” films were considered so because they were often violent gangster genre films. Similar to the 1970s, these films were popular, but received criticism for glorifying violence and crime; “the films promote a black macho criminal-capitalist ethic and are often violently sexist and homophobic” (Benshoff and Griffin 95).
            Despite this trend of blaxploitation films receiving criticism for their negative portrayals, we still see characteristics of the blaxploitation genre. The film Undercover Brother (2002) is a parody of the blaxploitation genre, and thus upholds many characteristics of the typical blaxploitation film. The protagonist is Undercover Brother (Eddie Griffin), who is recruited by the all-black agency, the B.R.O.T.H.E.R.H.O.O.D., to help stop the evil plot of “The Man” (literally). Griffin plays the typical blaxploitation protagonist: a super-fly, Cadillac driving, funky brother whose style is straight out of the 1970s. Undercover Brother is a perfect example of how Hollywood continues to employ characteristics blaxploitation. This film is a modern day rendition of the classic 1970s blaxploitation film.

            Another blaxploitation parody came out even more recently: Black Dynamite (2009). Similar to Undercover Brother, Black Dynamite is mocking blaxploitation films, and is thus very similar to them. I personally have not seen this one, but the storyline doesn’t surprise me: “Black Dynamite is the greatest African-American action star of the 1970s. When his only brother is killed by The Man it’s up to him to find justice” (Black Dynamite).
            Even when films aren’t directly spoofing on blaxploitation, they still often employ certain characteristics of blaxploitation. Films like Soul Plane (2004), Pulp Fiction (1994), How High (2001), Half Baked (1998), and Get Rich or Die Tryin’ (2005) are all examples of modern films that use characteristics of blaxploitation. In such films we still see drug dealing, womanizing, and stereotypes being associated with African-Americans.
            Despite the popularity of blaxploitation films, they are essentially portraying negative stereotypes of African-Americans. Currently, there may not be quintessential blaxploitation films being released, but we still see many spoofs on and characteristics of this genre in films. While African-Americans have made great progress in equality, Hollywood continues to portray the race stereotypically.

Works Cited

Benshoff, Harry M. and Sean Griffin. America On Film: Representing Race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality at the Movies. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Print.

“Black Dynamite (2009).” IMDb. IMDb.com, Inc. Web. 29 Nov. 2012.

Undercover Brother. Dir. Malcolm D. Lee. Perf. Eddie Griffin. Universal Pictures, 2002. Film.

Image: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067741/

Image: http://www.matttrailer.com/undercover_brother_2002

No comments:

Post a Comment